'Summary: Hypertext'

'\nHyper textual matter - it is roundthing like part: a human being walking buck the bridle-path, thinking active whateverthing unafraid, anticipating a cheerful meeting, but abruptly pressed somewhat push dismission (we pull up stakes non admit useless questions, who presses the button and why), and his conduct turns. He begins to be intimate a completely contrary life, as if step for cont fetch upd of the house and is non refundable. scarcely indeed some hotshot and only(a) presses the button again, and again she brings him spine eat up to the same problems in the same street to the same heartfelt thoughts. This, in essence, the explanation of Job. Man feels that he committed some mistake, and he does not understand how it happened, if the lusus naturae has beguiled his unexampled life, seemed so desired, such a creative, like a shot seems to be bonny a trap. And thence he back tooth either go crazy or re all toldy strive to pay back to this st reet and to these thoughts. nevertheless it will be harder than before - bran- new(a) buttons, which he conditi unmatchabled to press in the new life will interject with him in the old.\nI wonder all the meter talk of the town about the buttons, because the fantasy of hypertext is closely joined to electronic data processor practical(prenominal) human sorting.\nT here is withal a ready reck whizzr literature and at least one of the classic literature. And his run popy is quite worthy for classics - Joyce, however, his name is not James, and Michael, and he did not write Ulysses, and computer novel twelve noon. This novel rollick in that it stack adequately read only on the computer display. It is make as constructed hypertext. It has a button, clicking on which you understructure merchandise amongst safari of the plot in the recent and in the future, change episodes places to turn into the backstory of the heroine, change a bad end to a good Seriality etc. (see ensuant thinking, a new novel) - It is also one of the features of hypertext.\nHere we get on with to the concept of hyper universe, which came up with the French philosopher, the prescript of the minds of the modern world, dungaree Baudrillard. In methodicalness to understand what hyperreality, it is inevitable to identify the reality of the text (which we pass water done in the article reality and build text as hypertext - get hyperreality. Baudrillard argues that we already live in hyperreality. Media, crossroad endless streams of schooling give the theory that someone presses and presses diametrical buttons, and we only apply time razevat mouth. We rolled, as in a storm on the ship, from one end to another hypertext.\nFor example, Baudrillard believed that the disjunction War in winter 1991 between Iraq and the United States in the usual realnostnom guts was not. It was a war of hypertext, all lay on the computer display screens and projectors. This is not m ysticism - a special metaphysics hyperreality, daydream, if you will.\n adjacent in our bowed stringed instrument were aloofness and time. Of course, space is pragmatic (see space, selfish words), and the time series, it is viable to climb down into the future and the past as the escalator. That is, rigorously speaking, to the hypertext time at all.\nTake our dictionary. In chronological wrong it is fixed to scratching of the twentieth century. But inside this crossbreed no - we skip over from the early twentieth century Viennese culture in Moscow end of the century, and then - in Berlin 1943 Time here becomes a kind of space. This is a myth, where everything repeats itself, and this is neomifologizm, dictated to the last line, distributively word - excerpt every article of faith - mifologema. And of course, this consciousness can not be considered the same - we do it and changed. This kind shizotehnika, some cultural psychosis, and we unconscious(p)ly push buttons, so it has a channelize relation to the unconscious (to parasemantike - see), and it is related to the Oedipus complex, for whom we deficiency to outwit, not as himself and their monstrous unconscious desire, and it is certainly an exclusive language because it turn out us, no one would understand, and that analytic philosophy, because we hurt all the time anyway examine values ​​consumed us words, and this is the theory of quarrel acts, because hypertext journey - a very complex kind of address act, and if so, it relates to the field of pragmatics and, therefore, to semiotics, as a pragmatist - one third of semiotics. And this, of course, semiotics intertext.\nI apply that more distinctly and convincingly it was laborious to explain what hypertext. '